Church & Sermons & Sermons from Hell
Jan. 7th, 2007 11:42 pmQ. How many points should a sermon have?
A. At least one.
My grandmother relocated here recently. A lifelong Baptist, she was been a member of an American Baptist congregation in Ohio. (American Baptists are the liberal kind.) American Baptist churches are thin on the ground in Minnesota (we have Lutherans and Methodists instead) and I've been taking her around to various kinds of churches to see if she can find one where she feels at home.
We visited a Southern Baptist church the first week. It was very close to where she lives, and while they seemed conservative, they didn't seem freakishly so, at least over the phone. On the plus side, the preacher gave a really excellent sermon (the best of the bunch so far, in fact). On the minus side, when Grammie mentioned while chatting with a lady from the church that she had grown up near Lynchburg, the woman smiled warmly and told her how much she loved Jerry Falwell. (My grandmother thinks he's a raving nutbar.) They are a "mission-oriented" church. In some churches, a "mission" is where you go build houses in Honduras or serve soup in a soup kitchen or in some way do something useful with yourself. Not so much with this church. Their missionaries are out to Share the Word of God (with the heathens of London, England, in at least one case) and any house-building or soup-stirring they do is pretty incidental. Anyway, Grammie thanked me for taking her but wanted to check out a different church the following week.
We spent two weeks going to a United Methodist church in Edina. This was kind of a fascinating experience, as -- well -- to be blunt, I've never seen a church with this much money before. They had beautiful, fully equipped classrooms for every age group. Just for their Sunday School -- they don't run a school there during the week or anything like that. They have a gymnasium. My friend
malachitefer grew up Methodist and told me once that the basic Methodist worship service would involve getting together, singing a whole lot of hymns, and then having a potluck. Our second week, they rushed through a basic set of prayers and then presented a 45 minute concert, Vivaldi's Gloria. With a 100-person church choir plus a hired nine-piece string and wind ensemble.
Pretty cool, but Grammie wanted to see what else was around.
Last week, my mother took her to an American Baptist church in Minneapolis. It's not terribly close to her apartment, but my parents had some ideas for arranging rides if Grammie decided she really loved this church. Last week, she was very enthusiastic, and my mother remarked on how friendly the church was. So this week, I took her there again.
Heh.
Whoops.
It really does seem like a lovely church, honestly. They are so friendly. At most churches, if you make eye contact with someone, they'll smile and greet you. At this church, they'll smile, greet you, introduce themself, ask you where you're from, and strike up a conversation. Everyone does this. It's like they've been through training or something.
But, they had a guest pastor today to do their sermon. And she delivered a sermon about SEX.
If I had gone my whole life without having to hear the word "masturbation" while sitting next to my 82-year-old grandmother, that would have been okay. Ditto "pornography." Discussions of when masturbation and pornography are okay vs. not okay? I could've done without those, too. Comprehensive teen sex ed? Abortion rights? An explanation of how rape is wrong because it violates someone's "vulnerability"? NO THANK YOU. YOU SEE, I HAVE MY GRANDMOTHER WITH ME TODAY, AND SHE'S BOTHERED ENOUGH BY THE F-WORD. CAN'T WE HAVE A NICE SERMON ABOUT EPIPHANY INSTEAD?
It wasn't even a good sermon about sex. Let me extend Spurgeon's quote about how many points you need just a bit. Most sermons should have at least one point. If you're going to deliver a controversial sermon, or a sermon that will make a significant number of people present uncomfortable or angry, it should have exactly one point, forcefully and clearly delivered. Because otherwise, why bother? If you're going to piss people off, piss them off for a reason. Don't leave them saying to their spouse a few hours later, "Yeah, she talked about SEX IN CHURCH but I'm not sure why. Mostly the sermon was a tour of liberal positions on issues related to sex." As a liberal hearing the sermon, I wasn't offended by any of her views, but I wasn't enlightened, either; it wasn't thought-provoking, it didn't challenge me to reflect on anything. As a relative conservative hearing the sermon, my grandmother did not find it persuasive, merely upsetting. And it's not as if, with a dozen different sex-related topics, she really could make a coherent point beyond, "isn't it nice that we're all liberals?"
Oh, but she did tell us a limerick:
There was a young lady named Wilde
Who kept herself quite undefiled
By thinking of Jesus
and social diseases
And the fear of having a child.
Now, a useful sermon about sex might have focused on the issue of sexual ethics. (If you reject traditional moral teachings about sex, what ideas do you live by in order to ensure that you act ethically? Are there ideas in the Bible we can apply in a useful way? There's a lot of potential fodder here, stuff that might be thought-provoking rather than just a recognition and affirmation of everyone's progressivism.) She did touch on sexual ethics, but only briefly.
I'm honestly not sure how the rest of the congregation felt about the sermon -- whether some were shocked or whether this was just your average Sunday, as far as they were concerned. We might have gotten a sense at coffee hour, but Grammie didn't want to stay. I think she was offended by some of the opinions that the minister clearly thought everyone present would agree with (the minister's bashing of abstinence-only sex ed came across at times as anti-encouraging-abstinence-in-teens) but mostly I think she is just profoundly uncomfortable with open discussion of sex. It's the sort of thing she'll normally just avoid, but it's hard when you're ambushed somewhere you're really not expecting it. Who (other than Unitarians) expects a sex sermon at church? It's not that she thinks sex is dirty; it's more than she thinks it's private.
Grammie came back to my house for lunch, and Ed told her about the one time he heard a genuinely shocking sermon. In the fall of 1991, two of his friends got married. (I didn't know Ruth and Derek at the time, though both became good friends later.) The pastor -- of Ruth's childhood church, which was Missouri Synod Lutheran -- delivered a fire and brimstone sermon at the wedding. It started out -- everyone present can vouch for this -- with the words, "You are all going to die."
At least that one made for a really good story later.
A. At least one.
My grandmother relocated here recently. A lifelong Baptist, she was been a member of an American Baptist congregation in Ohio. (American Baptists are the liberal kind.) American Baptist churches are thin on the ground in Minnesota (we have Lutherans and Methodists instead) and I've been taking her around to various kinds of churches to see if she can find one where she feels at home.
We visited a Southern Baptist church the first week. It was very close to where she lives, and while they seemed conservative, they didn't seem freakishly so, at least over the phone. On the plus side, the preacher gave a really excellent sermon (the best of the bunch so far, in fact). On the minus side, when Grammie mentioned while chatting with a lady from the church that she had grown up near Lynchburg, the woman smiled warmly and told her how much she loved Jerry Falwell. (My grandmother thinks he's a raving nutbar.) They are a "mission-oriented" church. In some churches, a "mission" is where you go build houses in Honduras or serve soup in a soup kitchen or in some way do something useful with yourself. Not so much with this church. Their missionaries are out to Share the Word of God (with the heathens of London, England, in at least one case) and any house-building or soup-stirring they do is pretty incidental. Anyway, Grammie thanked me for taking her but wanted to check out a different church the following week.
We spent two weeks going to a United Methodist church in Edina. This was kind of a fascinating experience, as -- well -- to be blunt, I've never seen a church with this much money before. They had beautiful, fully equipped classrooms for every age group. Just for their Sunday School -- they don't run a school there during the week or anything like that. They have a gymnasium. My friend
Pretty cool, but Grammie wanted to see what else was around.
Last week, my mother took her to an American Baptist church in Minneapolis. It's not terribly close to her apartment, but my parents had some ideas for arranging rides if Grammie decided she really loved this church. Last week, she was very enthusiastic, and my mother remarked on how friendly the church was. So this week, I took her there again.
Heh.
Whoops.
It really does seem like a lovely church, honestly. They are so friendly. At most churches, if you make eye contact with someone, they'll smile and greet you. At this church, they'll smile, greet you, introduce themself, ask you where you're from, and strike up a conversation. Everyone does this. It's like they've been through training or something.
But, they had a guest pastor today to do their sermon. And she delivered a sermon about SEX.
If I had gone my whole life without having to hear the word "masturbation" while sitting next to my 82-year-old grandmother, that would have been okay. Ditto "pornography." Discussions of when masturbation and pornography are okay vs. not okay? I could've done without those, too. Comprehensive teen sex ed? Abortion rights? An explanation of how rape is wrong because it violates someone's "vulnerability"? NO THANK YOU. YOU SEE, I HAVE MY GRANDMOTHER WITH ME TODAY, AND SHE'S BOTHERED ENOUGH BY THE F-WORD. CAN'T WE HAVE A NICE SERMON ABOUT EPIPHANY INSTEAD?
It wasn't even a good sermon about sex. Let me extend Spurgeon's quote about how many points you need just a bit. Most sermons should have at least one point. If you're going to deliver a controversial sermon, or a sermon that will make a significant number of people present uncomfortable or angry, it should have exactly one point, forcefully and clearly delivered. Because otherwise, why bother? If you're going to piss people off, piss them off for a reason. Don't leave them saying to their spouse a few hours later, "Yeah, she talked about SEX IN CHURCH but I'm not sure why. Mostly the sermon was a tour of liberal positions on issues related to sex." As a liberal hearing the sermon, I wasn't offended by any of her views, but I wasn't enlightened, either; it wasn't thought-provoking, it didn't challenge me to reflect on anything. As a relative conservative hearing the sermon, my grandmother did not find it persuasive, merely upsetting. And it's not as if, with a dozen different sex-related topics, she really could make a coherent point beyond, "isn't it nice that we're all liberals?"
Oh, but she did tell us a limerick:
There was a young lady named Wilde
Who kept herself quite undefiled
By thinking of Jesus
and social diseases
And the fear of having a child.
Now, a useful sermon about sex might have focused on the issue of sexual ethics. (If you reject traditional moral teachings about sex, what ideas do you live by in order to ensure that you act ethically? Are there ideas in the Bible we can apply in a useful way? There's a lot of potential fodder here, stuff that might be thought-provoking rather than just a recognition and affirmation of everyone's progressivism.) She did touch on sexual ethics, but only briefly.
I'm honestly not sure how the rest of the congregation felt about the sermon -- whether some were shocked or whether this was just your average Sunday, as far as they were concerned. We might have gotten a sense at coffee hour, but Grammie didn't want to stay. I think she was offended by some of the opinions that the minister clearly thought everyone present would agree with (the minister's bashing of abstinence-only sex ed came across at times as anti-encouraging-abstinence-in-teens) but mostly I think she is just profoundly uncomfortable with open discussion of sex. It's the sort of thing she'll normally just avoid, but it's hard when you're ambushed somewhere you're really not expecting it. Who (other than Unitarians) expects a sex sermon at church? It's not that she thinks sex is dirty; it's more than she thinks it's private.
Grammie came back to my house for lunch, and Ed told her about the one time he heard a genuinely shocking sermon. In the fall of 1991, two of his friends got married. (I didn't know Ruth and Derek at the time, though both became good friends later.) The pastor -- of Ruth's childhood church, which was Missouri Synod Lutheran -- delivered a fire and brimstone sermon at the wedding. It started out -- everyone present can vouch for this -- with the words, "You are all going to die."
At least that one made for a really good story later.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 09:36 am (UTC)I'm so glad Episcopalians let you choose for yourself which parish you want to belong to, rather than saying "You live here, so you belong to this parish." We've belonged to St. Mary's Parish since before we were married and lived way out in Delran, because we really "clicked" with them, and later we moved to Burlington to be in the geographical area served by the parish because we wanted to strengthen our connection with them. Except for the hassle of flood insurance from living so close to the Delaware River, we couldn't be happier about the move as it brings us into a place with a true sense of community from a place that is a town in name only.
Best of luck to your Grammie in finding the right church for her, and thank goodness she's not a Unitarian!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:49 pm (UTC)If she were already Unitarian, though, she'd presumably be used to that and would find it easy to find a church that was a good fit. If she'd come from Boston and had attended one of the small number of UU churches with a strong Christian bent, though, we'd be visiting UCC churches, I think. There aren't any UU groups here with a strong Christian bent that I know of.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 01:16 am (UTC)As opposed to, um, who these days?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:09 pm (UTC)Why? I'm not sure what you're referring to - is it Unitarianism's liberalness, or do you percieve Unitarian churches as more widely-ranging in style?
I was raised Unitarian, but I haven't attended many religious services outside my own childhood church. I find it curious what others think of Unitarianism because it so often doesn't fit my experience.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:53 pm (UTC)The idea of my grandmother as UU made me snicker. She is politically semi-liberal, but she uses a kind of religious language that is pretty well anathema within the UU. I could expand on this at some point; it's one of the interesting cultural divisions within my family.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 10:54 pm (UTC)I'd be interested to read such an expansion. I have a moderate interest in how differences in wording and language can lead to alienation.
It took me years to figure out that when someone said, for example, "Alice has good energy", they weren't necessarily saying that Alice is generating some kind of supernatural waves or whatever, it might just be their way of saying that Alice is gracious or encouraging or fun to be around.
There's a good quote from this one Tai Chi instruction book that I need to go back and find, talking about how Eastern and Western medicine are fully compatible once you realize that when someone says you have an "influx of wind" (or whatever the example was), it might be just another way of conceptualizing the conditions that lead to having a runny nose (or whatever).
(Of course, in each of these cases it's also possible that the person did mean that Alice is generating supernatural waves or that the wind gods are angry or whatever...)
Not that I know whether this has anything to do with the "religious language that is pretty well anathema within the UU" that you mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 12:47 pm (UTC)We've been members at Bethlehem Lutheran in the uptown area (Lyndale & 41st) for a while, and we're pretty happy with it. They aren't Baptists, but it beats trying to find something a little less mega-complex in the Baptist arena (like, say, First Baptist or Wooddale, both of which I should email you about sometime. Brrr.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 02:24 pm (UTC)She worked at Wittenberg University in Springfield for 25 years, so she likes Lutherans.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:14 pm (UTC)(I know, they probably wouldn't remember each other even if they did overlap. But it's one of those questions that begs to be asked...)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 03:57 pm (UTC)Sheesh and heart's out to you and all that. Lordalmighty.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 04:10 pm (UTC)Emerson Congregational United Church of Christ
7601 Girard Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55423
(612) 869-3221
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 05:37 pm (UTC)Not only that, but WE had an Epiphany service! (I'm planning on writing a LJ entry on it, 'cuz I've never been to one before.)
If you're interested the Sr. pastor is Scott Stapelton (sp?), and every Thursday at noon he has a "Lunch With The Rev." thingie. I don't have the phone number on hand, and I don't believe we've much of a web-site, but I can get it to you... Wait a second, it's on my phone. It's 612 8728266.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 05:54 pm (UTC)Frequent potlucks, I'll give you.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:27 am (UTC)I've visited my family's current UMC a couple times, and it seems like a rough compromise between Fer's description and my childhood church. More music, and the sermons are medium length and medium boring.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:41 am (UTC)It's the custom at most American Jewish congregations (at least Reform and Conservative -- dunno about Orthodox) for the Rabbi to dress up in costume on Purim for the reading of the Book of Esther. My childhood Rabbi dressed up as a gorilla for one of these ("The Megillah Gorilla") which unfortunately terrified my younger brother. It was a pretty awesome costume, though. (His successor almost got fired after dressing up in Klan robes for Purim. He was portraying David Duke, with the idea being that he was dressed as a modern day Haman. You can probably imagine how this went over. Complete fucking lack of common sense knows no creed, clearly.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 03:53 am (UTC)And thank you for bringing up the bizarre memory of that wedding sermon on death. What I most remember was the line, "the coffin lid coming DOWN, DOWN, DOWN" as the minister mimed nailing. It was surreal. (I was next to Ed. He can probably vouch for this.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 07:27 am (UTC)Tangent: My grandparents escaped religion and took up something more rational -- radical politics (two Communists, one Socialist, one anarchist.) Amazing how much like religion political ideologies can be.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 06:41 pm (UTC)